<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Christocentric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christocentric.com/main/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christocentric.com/main</link>
	<description>Christ-centered commentary NOT for the faint of heart!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:43:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social scientists vs. Spanking &#8211; Does spanking make your children dumber? by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=2604&#038;cpage=1#comment-4214</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=2604#comment-4214</guid>
		<description>First, the 49% reported increase compared the Swedish rate with two American studies, done in 1975 and 1985. Problem with that comparison is child abuse was measured differently. It is like comparing the FBI&#039;s homicide rate (which includes suicides) with the homicide rate in England (which doesn&#039;t include suicides). The Swedish report includes allegations, both of the United States reports did not... thus, it made Sweden look like there was more child abuse. This is why it&#039;s always problematic to compare different studies that measure the consequences differently. 

Finally Hyman in 1997 conducted very rigorous research which showed that child abuse is much less prevalent in Sweden, spanking is view as abuse by the vast majority of parents, and that delinquent behavior (measured by academics, jailing, etc) continues to decrease in Sweden. The EU conducted similar studies on the effects of the German, Italian, etc spanking ban... and the results are the same. Combined with the fact that spanking leads to more aggressive behavior, lower IQ, etc... this is why the American Pediatric Association finally spoke out against it in the late 90s. Why... because the empirical evidence is overwhelmingly against spanking.  

You say the end result is what matters. Look at the USA compared to Europe. The statistics on rape, burglary, assault, and murder are much higher than Sweden. For a nation that doesn&#039;t &quot;discipline&quot; their children... their young adults seem especially civilized.

You then go to counter empirical evidence with anecdotal evidence. Guess what, my parents were against spanking... and I am in medical school with my sister in law school and my oldest brother owning his own business. 

And I love how you quote a proverb from Solomon... who&#039;s son was a tyrant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the 49% reported increase compared the Swedish rate with two American studies, done in 1975 and 1985. Problem with that comparison is child abuse was measured differently. It is like comparing the FBI&#8217;s homicide rate (which includes suicides) with the homicide rate in England (which doesn&#8217;t include suicides). The Swedish report includes allegations, both of the United States reports did not&#8230; thus, it made Sweden look like there was more child abuse. This is why it&#8217;s always problematic to compare different studies that measure the consequences differently. </p>
<p>Finally Hyman in 1997 conducted very rigorous research which showed that child abuse is much less prevalent in Sweden, spanking is view as abuse by the vast majority of parents, and that delinquent behavior (measured by academics, jailing, etc) continues to decrease in Sweden. The EU conducted similar studies on the effects of the German, Italian, etc spanking ban&#8230; and the results are the same. Combined with the fact that spanking leads to more aggressive behavior, lower IQ, etc&#8230; this is why the American Pediatric Association finally spoke out against it in the late 90s. Why&#8230; because the empirical evidence is overwhelmingly against spanking.  </p>
<p>You say the end result is what matters. Look at the USA compared to Europe. The statistics on rape, burglary, assault, and murder are much higher than Sweden. For a nation that doesn&#8217;t &#8220;discipline&#8221; their children&#8230; their young adults seem especially civilized.</p>
<p>You then go to counter empirical evidence with anecdotal evidence. Guess what, my parents were against spanking&#8230; and I am in medical school with my sister in law school and my oldest brother owning his own business. </p>
<p>And I love how you quote a proverb from Solomon&#8230; who&#8217;s son was a tyrant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &quot;Speaking In Tongues&quot; &#8211; Why We Shouldn&#039;t! by Mick Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=427&#038;cpage=1#comment-4108</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlottamorrow.wordpress.com/?p=427#comment-4108</guid>
		<description>The following video is very helpful in understanding the gifts of tongues, prophecy and knowledge and why they ceased.

Speaking In Tongues Part A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qi6fIUpvZUI

God bless,
Mick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following video is very helpful in understanding the gifts of tongues, prophecy and knowledge and why they ceased.</p>
<p>Speaking In Tongues Part A<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qi6fIUpvZUI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qi6fIUpvZUI</a></p>
<p>God bless,<br />
Mick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can you be a Christian AND a homosexual? by Dan Trabue</title>
		<link>http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=2151&#038;cpage=1#comment-4080</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Trabue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christocentric.com/?p=2151#comment-4080</guid>
		<description>Sorry I&#039;m late to this dance, but I had a question. Where you say...

&lt;I&gt;But people who practice homosexuality with NO repentance and even trying to use the scriptures to justify their abominable acts are clearly NOT CHRISTIANS!  They are defiant and of a reprobate mind.&lt;/I&gt;

In reviewing your description of how to be saved, I mostly agree (I&#039;d certainly add, &quot;believe in the LIFE and TEACHINGS of Jesus, along with his death and resurrection, but perhaps you meant that...). So, we agree upon that part.

But then it seems to me that you&#039;re adding an additional works-based hoop through which to jump. You seem to be saying that one has to admit they&#039;re a sinner, ask forgiveness, make Jesus Lord of their life AND AGREE with the traditional church teaching on issues surrounding homosexuality. Perhaps that&#039;s not what you&#039;re saying, but it&#039;s what it sounds like you&#039;re saying. 

Could you clarify?

The reason I ask is that I know plenty of Christians in the traditional sense (myself included) who have been saved by God&#039;s grace through faith in Jesus, the Christ who sincerely desire to walk in Jesus&#039; steps, according to Scripture, and who take the Bible very seriously as God&#039;s revelation to us.

We&#039;ve studied the scripture and come to a different conclusion than you have on this one particular &quot;sin&quot; (what you consider a sin, which I don&#039;t).

Do you think a person has to be &quot;right&quot; on every sin (ie, have perfect knowledge of all possible right and wrong actions in their life) in order to be saved, too? That would seem to be a pretty tall order. It is my belief, and my church&#039;s belief, that God&#039;s grace covers our misunderstandings. That someone can be sincerely mistaken about an action and still be saved, albeit wrong about that action.

You&#039;re not saying that a person has to have perfect knowledge of all sin, are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I&#8217;m late to this dance, but I had a question. Where you say&#8230;</p>
<p><i>But people who practice homosexuality with NO repentance and even trying to use the scriptures to justify their abominable acts are clearly NOT CHRISTIANS!  They are defiant and of a reprobate mind.</i></p>
<p>In reviewing your description of how to be saved, I mostly agree (I&#8217;d certainly add, &#8220;believe in the LIFE and TEACHINGS of Jesus, along with his death and resurrection, but perhaps you meant that&#8230;). So, we agree upon that part.</p>
<p>But then it seems to me that you&#8217;re adding an additional works-based hoop through which to jump. You seem to be saying that one has to admit they&#8217;re a sinner, ask forgiveness, make Jesus Lord of their life AND AGREE with the traditional church teaching on issues surrounding homosexuality. Perhaps that&#8217;s not what you&#8217;re saying, but it&#8217;s what it sounds like you&#8217;re saying. </p>
<p>Could you clarify?</p>
<p>The reason I ask is that I know plenty of Christians in the traditional sense (myself included) who have been saved by God&#8217;s grace through faith in Jesus, the Christ who sincerely desire to walk in Jesus&#8217; steps, according to Scripture, and who take the Bible very seriously as God&#8217;s revelation to us.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve studied the scripture and come to a different conclusion than you have on this one particular &#8220;sin&#8221; (what you consider a sin, which I don&#8217;t).</p>
<p>Do you think a person has to be &#8220;right&#8221; on every sin (ie, have perfect knowledge of all possible right and wrong actions in their life) in order to be saved, too? That would seem to be a pretty tall order. It is my belief, and my church&#8217;s belief, that God&#8217;s grace covers our misunderstandings. That someone can be sincerely mistaken about an action and still be saved, albeit wrong about that action.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not saying that a person has to have perfect knowledge of all sin, are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &quot;Speaking In Tongues&quot; &#8211; Why We Shouldn&#039;t! by False Holy Spirit Invading The Church? - Christianity - Page 12 - City-Data Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=427&#038;cpage=1#comment-4036</link>
		<dc:creator>False Holy Spirit Invading The Church? - Christianity - Page 12 - City-Data Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlottamorrow.wordpress.com/?p=427#comment-4036</guid>
		<description>[...] as one that need no interpretation.  And yet you wonder why and how these invasions are occurring.  &quot;Speaking In Tongues&quot; &#8211; Why We Shouldn&#039;t! &#124; Christocentric   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as one that need no interpretation.  And yet you wonder why and how these invasions are occurring.  &quot;Speaking In Tongues&quot; &#8211; Why We Shouldn&#039;t! | Christocentric   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pregnancy Pact: What works best &#8211; abstinence or contraception? by sunshine7</title>
		<link>http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=3085&#038;cpage=1#comment-4026</link>
		<dc:creator>sunshine7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=3085#comment-4026</guid>
		<description>Carlotta:
I love your realistic and sensible attitude towards this subject.  You stuck to your guns and you should be happy about that, as I&#039;m sure you are.  It&#039;s extremely difficult to raise Godly children in today&#039;s society and often unrealistic to think that all will &quot;always be well&quot;.  However, it&#039;s also extremely necessary to stick to our guns so as to be as positive of an example as we can be.  

As far as parents go, leaving children alone, because we think they are saintly, as was done on the movie, is terribly naive and even arrogant.  I remember hearing about a pastor and his wife, going out of town to a convention of some sort, and leaving their children home.  Because the older children were at home, which were about 17 or 18 years old, I guess they thought it would be okay.  Well, one of the children, who was about the age of 12, lost her virginity, right under the nose of the two elder siblings.  This pastor, his wife, and the two older siblings were entirely clueless.  The 12 year old ended up missing her menstrual cycle by a couple of days or so.  She was scared she was pregnant.  It just so happened that she was not.  To top it off, years later, the mother became pastor after the father died (I am getting to a point) and had the nerve to stand up in the pulpit and declare with certainty that all of her daughters were virgins.  How embarrassingly sad for that pastor and mother that she, after all of those years, was clueless as to her daughters&#039; behavior.  It turns out that none of them were virgins.  How about that?

My point here is that we cannot leave our children alone.  It doesn&#039;t work.  We can&#039;t even leave them around certain people who &quot;we&quot; think are responsible.  The endorphins which are released during even the fondling part of sexual activity are entirely too strong for us to imagine that our children can fight that sort of thing off.  They will not be able to withstand that.  They will cave into it, whether we believe it or not.  This is why it is essential that we not allow our children to be alone with each other without a chaperone.  Old fashioned or not, it works.  Hope this helps.  Blessings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlotta:<br />
I love your realistic and sensible attitude towards this subject.  You stuck to your guns and you should be happy about that, as I&#8217;m sure you are.  It&#8217;s extremely difficult to raise Godly children in today&#8217;s society and often unrealistic to think that all will &#8220;always be well&#8221;.  However, it&#8217;s also extremely necessary to stick to our guns so as to be as positive of an example as we can be.  </p>
<p>As far as parents go, leaving children alone, because we think they are saintly, as was done on the movie, is terribly naive and even arrogant.  I remember hearing about a pastor and his wife, going out of town to a convention of some sort, and leaving their children home.  Because the older children were at home, which were about 17 or 18 years old, I guess they thought it would be okay.  Well, one of the children, who was about the age of 12, lost her virginity, right under the nose of the two elder siblings.  This pastor, his wife, and the two older siblings were entirely clueless.  The 12 year old ended up missing her menstrual cycle by a couple of days or so.  She was scared she was pregnant.  It just so happened that she was not.  To top it off, years later, the mother became pastor after the father died (I am getting to a point) and had the nerve to stand up in the pulpit and declare with certainty that all of her daughters were virgins.  How embarrassingly sad for that pastor and mother that she, after all of those years, was clueless as to her daughters&#8217; behavior.  It turns out that none of them were virgins.  How about that?</p>
<p>My point here is that we cannot leave our children alone.  It doesn&#8217;t work.  We can&#8217;t even leave them around certain people who &#8220;we&#8221; think are responsible.  The endorphins which are released during even the fondling part of sexual activity are entirely too strong for us to imagine that our children can fight that sort of thing off.  They will not be able to withstand that.  They will cave into it, whether we believe it or not.  This is why it is essential that we not allow our children to be alone with each other without a chaperone.  Old fashioned or not, it works.  Hope this helps.  Blessings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Steve Harvey&#039;s New Book: Act Like a Lady and Think Like a &#8211; Heathen? by sunshine7</title>
		<link>http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=1550&#038;cpage=1#comment-4025</link>
		<dc:creator>sunshine7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christocentric.com/?p=1550#comment-4025</guid>
		<description>In all fairness, I do have to add that after reading Steve Harvey&#039;s book, I did find parts that were of value.  These parts were how men think.  We as women need to know that.  We need to know how men view us and how they are wired.  I think he did a pretty good job of sharing that with us.  However, the shrugging off of the responsibility of the man in a courship situation is a cop out.  Also, there are responsiblities that the woman has.  Our older women are to teach the younger women.  Women need to know that men are extremely visual.  They are visually wired.  God made them that way.  This is why so much emphasis is put upon what women wear and how revealing it should or should not be.  Women on the other hand are emotional and that&#039;s how we&#039;re wired.  Men are also agressive by nature.  Women are tender by nature.  Both men and women have to fight against their nature at times.  In particular, they must fight against going overboard with their nature.  The men must fight the overuse of their visual, agressiveness.  The women must fight the overuse of their emotional, tenderness.  God also wired normal men, to love a challenge.  If a man doesn&#039;t feel challenged, he won&#039;t appreciate the thing that was easily acquired.  This includes women.  If a man can easily get a woman, he will not appreciate her.  On the other hand, if a man has to go through much to get a woman, then chances are he will appreciate her more.  This is just the truth.  Therefore, women must learn that being hard to get is essential in having a man that appreciates them more.  A man enjoys, very much, the challenge, or the &quot;fight&quot;, so to speak, to get you.  If he isn&#039;t challenged, he cannot see (because he is not wired that way) the point in pursuing you any further because he figures you&#039;re not worth much (because he didn&#039;t have to do much to get you).  Like it or not,this is the way it is.  I didn&#039;t make this up.  It has been this way since Adam was created.  Even if doing the courting the Amish way seems extreme, at least make it so that winning your heart is a challenge to him.  And oh yes,no matter what they tell you, a man wants a submissive woman, not a rebellious one.  Be a lady and he will love you like one, if he&#039;s a decent, normal, human being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all fairness, I do have to add that after reading Steve Harvey&#8217;s book, I did find parts that were of value.  These parts were how men think.  We as women need to know that.  We need to know how men view us and how they are wired.  I think he did a pretty good job of sharing that with us.  However, the shrugging off of the responsibility of the man in a courship situation is a cop out.  Also, there are responsiblities that the woman has.  Our older women are to teach the younger women.  Women need to know that men are extremely visual.  They are visually wired.  God made them that way.  This is why so much emphasis is put upon what women wear and how revealing it should or should not be.  Women on the other hand are emotional and that&#8217;s how we&#8217;re wired.  Men are also agressive by nature.  Women are tender by nature.  Both men and women have to fight against their nature at times.  In particular, they must fight against going overboard with their nature.  The men must fight the overuse of their visual, agressiveness.  The women must fight the overuse of their emotional, tenderness.  God also wired normal men, to love a challenge.  If a man doesn&#8217;t feel challenged, he won&#8217;t appreciate the thing that was easily acquired.  This includes women.  If a man can easily get a woman, he will not appreciate her.  On the other hand, if a man has to go through much to get a woman, then chances are he will appreciate her more.  This is just the truth.  Therefore, women must learn that being hard to get is essential in having a man that appreciates them more.  A man enjoys, very much, the challenge, or the &#8220;fight&#8221;, so to speak, to get you.  If he isn&#8217;t challenged, he cannot see (because he is not wired that way) the point in pursuing you any further because he figures you&#8217;re not worth much (because he didn&#8217;t have to do much to get you).  Like it or not,this is the way it is.  I didn&#8217;t make this up.  It has been this way since Adam was created.  Even if doing the courting the Amish way seems extreme, at least make it so that winning your heart is a challenge to him.  And oh yes,no matter what they tell you, a man wants a submissive woman, not a rebellious one.  Be a lady and he will love you like one, if he&#8217;s a decent, normal, human being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Steve Harvey&#039;s New Book: Act Like a Lady and Think Like a &#8211; Heathen? by sunshine7</title>
		<link>http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=1550&#038;cpage=1#comment-4024</link>
		<dc:creator>sunshine7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christocentric.com/?p=1550#comment-4024</guid>
		<description>The sad truth is that waiting until marriage for sex is so rare that you might find it amongst, maybe the Amish, or in middle eastern countries, perhaps amongst some orthodox Jews, but rarely, rarely in churches that we associate with.  That is just the truth.  Now, it is an awful shame.  Whatever happened to chaperones during courtship, and not allowing a couple to be alone for any length of time?  We have been brainwashed by our tv sets, and the public school system, to think that dating and having boyfriends and girlfriends are okay and normal.  Please get G.Craig Lewis&#039; series on &quot;The Truth about Dating&quot;.  Also, do a study on how Orthodox Jews and some other conservative cultures, including, but not limited to the Amish and Mennonites, handle these sort of issues.  Churches, in general have not been meeting the mark.  Parents and grandparents have not been meeting the mark.  We have to do something to stop this promiscuity.  We shouldn&#039;t even allow our kids to spend the night over other children&#039;s houses, even our own relatives&#039; houses, because sometimes, this is where sexual exposure takes place.  Oh yeah, Satan is extremely cunning.  We must watch our children as much as possible and we ourselves are not to be in close corners and by ourselves with the opposite sex.  Men are supposed to get permission from the parents of the woman he wishes to court.  Then, they should in turn follow up with his parents to see what type of person he is and what kind of family he comes from, before they make a decision.  They are never to be left alone, not even for a second.  As far fetched as this may sound to many, it is absolutely necessary.  Now, as far as Steve Harvey goes, his 90 day stipulation is indeed a travesty.  I read the book and found it very repulsive.  Putting a time limit on something so sacred is repugnant, to say the least.  Marriage first, is not only possible, it is God&#039;s choice.  Let us go back to the old landmark.  We may not be able to help what has already happened to us because of the ignorance of our parents and foreparents.  However, we can help out the future generation if we start now.  We must start somewhere.  Homeschooling, without interruption, is absoultely one of the best resources I&#039;ve seen as far as helping children to keep away from pre-marital sex.  I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s the perfect answer, but if done with the proper support,  and without extended family trying to turn the children away from good upbringing, it can be oh so successful.  (you may have to pull an Abraham, and move far away from extended family members who are nibby--plan it but don&#039;t tell your plans and do it before you have children or before the family has a chance to take you to court to demand visitation, if you don&#039;t want their influence to be upon your children--I know what I&#039;m talking about, believe me when I tell you)  I&#039;ll say it again, the 90 day rule is ridiculous.  That is a trick of the enemy, so watch it ladies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad truth is that waiting until marriage for sex is so rare that you might find it amongst, maybe the Amish, or in middle eastern countries, perhaps amongst some orthodox Jews, but rarely, rarely in churches that we associate with.  That is just the truth.  Now, it is an awful shame.  Whatever happened to chaperones during courtship, and not allowing a couple to be alone for any length of time?  We have been brainwashed by our tv sets, and the public school system, to think that dating and having boyfriends and girlfriends are okay and normal.  Please get G.Craig Lewis&#8217; series on &#8220;The Truth about Dating&#8221;.  Also, do a study on how Orthodox Jews and some other conservative cultures, including, but not limited to the Amish and Mennonites, handle these sort of issues.  Churches, in general have not been meeting the mark.  Parents and grandparents have not been meeting the mark.  We have to do something to stop this promiscuity.  We shouldn&#8217;t even allow our kids to spend the night over other children&#8217;s houses, even our own relatives&#8217; houses, because sometimes, this is where sexual exposure takes place.  Oh yeah, Satan is extremely cunning.  We must watch our children as much as possible and we ourselves are not to be in close corners and by ourselves with the opposite sex.  Men are supposed to get permission from the parents of the woman he wishes to court.  Then, they should in turn follow up with his parents to see what type of person he is and what kind of family he comes from, before they make a decision.  They are never to be left alone, not even for a second.  As far fetched as this may sound to many, it is absolutely necessary.  Now, as far as Steve Harvey goes, his 90 day stipulation is indeed a travesty.  I read the book and found it very repulsive.  Putting a time limit on something so sacred is repugnant, to say the least.  Marriage first, is not only possible, it is God&#8217;s choice.  Let us go back to the old landmark.  We may not be able to help what has already happened to us because of the ignorance of our parents and foreparents.  However, we can help out the future generation if we start now.  We must start somewhere.  Homeschooling, without interruption, is absoultely one of the best resources I&#8217;ve seen as far as helping children to keep away from pre-marital sex.  I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s the perfect answer, but if done with the proper support,  and without extended family trying to turn the children away from good upbringing, it can be oh so successful.  (you may have to pull an Abraham, and move far away from extended family members who are nibby&#8211;plan it but don&#8217;t tell your plans and do it before you have children or before the family has a chance to take you to court to demand visitation, if you don&#8217;t want their influence to be upon your children&#8211;I know what I&#8217;m talking about, believe me when I tell you)  I&#8217;ll say it again, the 90 day rule is ridiculous.  That is a trick of the enemy, so watch it ladies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Public Schools Becoming More Anti Christian? by sunshine7</title>
		<link>http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=3043&#038;cpage=1#comment-4023</link>
		<dc:creator>sunshine7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=3043#comment-4023</guid>
		<description>Okay, okay, this is definitely for me.  I am a huge homeschool advocate.  I have homeschooled all of my children at one time or another.  In fact, i am still homeschooling my two youngest children and I also tutor other homeschooled children.  I have daughter who attends Rutgers University, and another who received a full 4 year scholarship to Montclair State University.  Let me tell you, homeschooling definitely works and people of faith should strongly consider it for their children.  If you cannot do it yourself, then pray to find someone reputable who will help you by tutoring your child for you, while they homeschool their own children.  Thank God for it, indeed.  This helps to combat the indoctrination of many wicked things which are taught in public schools.  Evil communications corrupt good manners.  If anyone has questions about it, seriously, let me know.  I&#039;d be more than happy to help in any way I can.  Blessings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, okay, this is definitely for me.  I am a huge homeschool advocate.  I have homeschooled all of my children at one time or another.  In fact, i am still homeschooling my two youngest children and I also tutor other homeschooled children.  I have daughter who attends Rutgers University, and another who received a full 4 year scholarship to Montclair State University.  Let me tell you, homeschooling definitely works and people of faith should strongly consider it for their children.  If you cannot do it yourself, then pray to find someone reputable who will help you by tutoring your child for you, while they homeschool their own children.  Thank God for it, indeed.  This helps to combat the indoctrination of many wicked things which are taught in public schools.  Evil communications corrupt good manners.  If anyone has questions about it, seriously, let me know.  I&#8217;d be more than happy to help in any way I can.  Blessings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can you be a Christian AND a homosexual? by sunshine7</title>
		<link>http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=2151&#038;cpage=1#comment-4022</link>
		<dc:creator>sunshine7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christocentric.com/?p=2151#comment-4022</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t agree more with both you Carlotta and Job.  Outstanding analysis Job.  Simply outstanding!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t agree more with both you Carlotta and Job.  Outstanding analysis Job.  Simply outstanding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gospel Singer Tonex admits to being Gay by Carlotta Morrow</title>
		<link>http://www.christocentric.com/main/?p=2120&#038;cpage=1#comment-4021</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlotta Morrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christocentric.com/?p=2120#comment-4021</guid>
		<description>Sunshine, you are right about this generation.  This is the generation that believes that God&#039;s love conforms to their own individual desires. This generation also picks and chooses what commandments of God they wish to obey, without a full self-denying commitment to Him. 

Sadly, Tonex (aka Brian Slade) is just another example of this self-centered self-fulfilling false worship of God and all we can do is continue praying for him and others like him when they refuse to adhere to God&#039;s true word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunshine, you are right about this generation.  This is the generation that believes that God&#8217;s love conforms to their own individual desires. This generation also picks and chooses what commandments of God they wish to obey, without a full self-denying commitment to Him. </p>
<p>Sadly, Tonex (aka Brian Slade) is just another example of this self-centered self-fulfilling false worship of God and all we can do is continue praying for him and others like him when they refuse to adhere to God&#8217;s true word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
